Legal Opinion
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Spark Tarrytown, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 5, 1993No. 92 Civ. 7053 (VLB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.
I
On September 29, 1992, I granted the proposed order of plaintiff Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) for ex parte appointment of a receiver because of exceptional circumstances justifying proceeding without notice. This memorandum is designed to explain the reasons for my granting the relief requested. The FHLMC’s application in this case meets the stringent requirements which are prerequisites to granting ex parte motions for receiverships.
II
In Connecticut v. Doehr, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2105, 115 L.Ed.2d 1 (1991), the United State…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In the Matter of Vuitton Et Fils S.ACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Citibank, N.A. v. Nyland (CF8) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- United States v. IannielloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Marion Mortgage Co. v. EdmundsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
3Cited by8 opinions
- Little Tor Auto Center v. Exxon Co. USADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. TsinosDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Frommert v. BeckerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016
- United States v. GullaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Spark Tarrytown, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.