Legal Opinion
United States v. Gulla
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 13, 1993No. 92 Cr. 1236 (VLB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.
I
Nations in the European Economic Community (“EEC”) have imposed restrictions on the importation of hormone-containing meat products produced in the United States. A Presidential finding, citing no sources, has been made to the effect that the hormones in those meat products are not harmful to human health. To induce the EEC nations to remove the import restrictions on those American meat products, the United States by Executive action has increased the importation duty on selected vegetable products: an increase from 13.6% to 100% has been…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. SolomonyanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- United States v. SolomonyanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Wallace Oil Co., Inc. v. MichaelsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- USA v. Samaritan, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
- United States v. GullaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993