Legal Opinion

Kipp v. Incorporated Village of Ardsley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In each action, for judgment declaring void the Building Code of the Village of Ardsley insofar as it imposes a 10-foot front yard setback restriction, to enjoin defendants from enforcing such restriction, and for other relief, defendants appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 30, 1960, and entered September 8, 1960, which denied their cross motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice; granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment; declared null and void the setback restriction insofar as it affects…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. People Ex Rel. Doscher v. . SissonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Headley v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Noyes v. Erie & Wyoming Farmers Co-Operative Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. People Ex Rel. Buffalo & Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Council of Chevy Chase View v. RothmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. McDowell v. United StatesColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Town of Waterboro v. LessardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  4. Claudio v. Village of GreenportNew York Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API