Legal Opinion
Davis v. Apfel
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 14, 2001No. 1:00-cv-10010PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LAWSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a complaint seeking-review of an agency decision denying his appeal following the termination of his supplemental security income (SSI) benefits. Plaintiff had been receiving supplemental security income benefits after previously having been adjudicated disabled due to drug addiction or alcoholism. However, in 1996 Congress amended the Social Security Act to deny benefits to individuals for whom alcoholism or drug addiction was a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Luther D. Mullen v. Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Richard G. Shepherd v. Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Clarence WALTERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Street v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Lohr v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- KIENUTSKE v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Mathious v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- Stennett v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007