Legal Opinion

Mathious v. Barnhart

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 23, 2007No. 05-74714PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

LAWSON, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the report issued on March 29, 2007 by Magistrate Judge Steven D. Pepe pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that this Court grant in part the plaintiffs motion for summary judgement, deny the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and remand the case for further administrative proceedings. Although the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Tagger v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008