Legal Opinion

Stennett v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 1, 2007No. 05-CV-74358Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOCUMENT #11) AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

STEEH, District Judge.

This matter is one in which plaintiff Thomas Stennett challenges the Social Security Administration’s determination to deny his application for disability and disability insurance benefits. As provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(b)(2), the case was assigned to Magistrate Judge Whalen for pre-trial proceedings.

Before the court is the magistrate’s Report and Recommendation, filed January 29, 2007, concerning the parties’…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API