Legal Opinion

In Re the Last Will & Testament of Lomax

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

The record discloses that in charging the jury on the second issue, and after declaring the law as to the burden of proof, and reviewing the evidence offered by the respective parties bearing on the issue, the court gave this instruction :

“Bringing the question or issue to a final conclusion, and again summarizing the law for you, the burden of proof on this issue is on the caveators, those who object to the setting up of the paper writing. The court instructs you that if their evidence has satisfied you from its quality and convincing power that at the time of executing the will that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . StiwinterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. State v. . RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. State v. . KlineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Snipes v. . MondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. State v. . StarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. In Re the Will of YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. In Re the Last Will & Testament of LomaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. State v. . SetzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API