Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Holland v. City of Reno

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1953No. 3758PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*168OPINION

(On Motion To Dismiss)

By the Court,

Merrill, J.:

This is an original proceeding by complaint and information in the nature of a quo warranto filed by relators under leave of court. Relators, are owners of property which respondent City of Reno proposes to annex. They here seek to prevent such annexation, contending that it is improper and that in proceeding to that end the city is guilty of misuse of its legislative charter and franchise. The matter is now before us upon the motion of respondents to dismiss the action. Two grounds are advanced for this motion.

First: It is contended by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lemasters v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State ex rel. McMillan v. SadlerNevada Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State Ex Rel. Bibb v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State Ex Rel. MacK v. TorreysonNevada Supreme Court · 1893
  5. State ex rel. City of Reno v. Reno Traction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lueck v. TeutonNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Belec v. AmercoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Lueck v. TeutonNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State Ex Rel. Mathews v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API