State Ex Rel. Bibb v. City of Reno
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Eather, C. J.:
Relators, by quo warranto, attack a Reno city ordinance annexing about 50 acres of agricultural land owned by relators. Respondents, mayor and councilmen, filed a general demurrer. In substance, the complaint, map, and other exhibits show:
The annexation is a misuse of the city’s franchise, is arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable, unnecessary, and a taking of property without due process, for the following reasons:
Annexation would result in substantial depreciation in value of the lands, now used for agriculture, ranching, and fruit growing; restrictive city…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Clark v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Morford v. UngerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- State of Florida Ex Rel. Davis v. City of StuartSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Searle v. YensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- McDonnell Aircraft Corporation v. City of BerkeleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Potvin v. Village of ChubbuckIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Water District No. 1 v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Taylor v. City of ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.