Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bibb v. City of Reno

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1947No. 3476PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Eather, C. J.:

Relators, by quo warranto, attack a Reno city ordinance annexing about 50 acres of agricultural land owned by relators. Respondents, mayor and councilmen, filed a general demurrer. In substance, the complaint, map, and other exhibits show:

The annexation is a misuse of the city’s franchise, is arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable, unnecessary, and a taking of property without due process, for the following reasons:

Annexation would result in substantial depreciation in value of the lands, now used for agriculture, ranching, and fruit growing; restrictive city…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Clark v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Morford v. UngerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  3. State of Florida Ex Rel. Davis v. City of StuartSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  4. Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  5. Searle v. YensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. McDonnell Aircraft Corporation v. City of BerkeleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Potvin v. Village of ChubbuckIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Water District No. 1 v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Taylor v. City of ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API