State Ex Rel. Mathews v. City of Reno
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, J.:
The state, upon the relation of the named relators, to whom the attorney general was added by an earlier order of this court, filed its complaint and information in the nature of a quo warranto, praying that respondents be ousted and excluded from the lands of relators and barred from using or enjoying any rights, privileges or corporate powers of the City of Reno upon or concerning said lands. In particular the complaint attacked the legality of an ordinance annexing the lands in question. On November 5, 1953 we denied a motion to dismiss the proceedings, 70 Nev.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kelly v. PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- State ex inf. Major v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- County of Norfolk v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Bibb v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.