Plattner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Chief Judge.
This case raises the issue of whether an attorney can recover against an opposing party for interference with that attorney's relationship with his client, and whether the facts presented by the attorney here were sufficient to survive the opposing party’s motion for summary judgment.
The plaintiff/appellant, Richard Plattner, (Plattner) appeals from the. trial court’s order granting summary judgment and attorneys’ fees in favor of defendant/appellee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) in this action for intentional interference with a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Galloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Antwerp Diamond Exchange of America, Inc. v. Better Business Bureau of Maricopa County, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lewis v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Rosner v. Denim & Diamonds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Briggs v. NewtonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- ABCDW LLC v. BanningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Cactus Wren Partners v. Arizona Department of Building & Fire SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.