Legal Opinion

Cactus Wren Partners v. Arizona Department of Building & Fire Safety

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 14, 1993No. 1 CA-CV 91-0263PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EHRLICH, Presiding Judge.

Cactus Wren Partners (“Cactus Wren”) appeals from a superior court judgment determining that the adjudicative authority exercised by a mobile home parks hearing officer (“hearing officer”) of the Arizona Department of Building and Fire Safety (“Department”) did not violate Article III of the Arizona Constitution. It also appeals from the court’s affirmation of the officer’s directive to Cactus Wren to refund administrative fees and trash and sewage service charges it assessed its tenants. We conclude that the powers exercised by the hearing officer did not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Walnut Creek Manor v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. RiosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. State ex rel. Veskrna v. SteelNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Facilitec Inc v. J Elliott HibbsArizona Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API