Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Hamshaw

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1910No. 9110PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Canfield, J., entered February 19, 1910, upon a trial and conviction of practicing dentistry without a license.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Defendant was brought to trial before a justice of the peace, upon the following complaint:

“George W. Wentworth, being first duly sworn, according to law, says: That at Marysville, in the county of Snohomish, state of Washington, on or about the 15th day of November, 1909, C. W. Hamshaw did practice dentistry without having obtained and filed a license as required by law in the county of Snohomish, state of Washington; the said county at all times mentioned being the place of residence of the said C. W. Hamshaw.”

After moving to the jurisdiction of the court and the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. StraubWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. BringgoldWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. QuinnWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. Van CleveWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HurdWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. State v. HarveyOregon Supreme Court · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API