Legal Opinion

Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Bodenstedt

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1960No. 34805PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYeager, J.

This is an action instituted by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, a corporation, plaintiff and appellee, against Herbert Bodenstedt, doing business as Herb’s Buick Company, defendant and appellant. Issues were joined by appropriate pleadings. Thereafter the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment in its favor. The defendant filed a motion in resistance and for summary judgment in his favor. The case came on for hearing before the court on the pleadings, the motions for summary judgment, and the respective supporting showings of the parties, at the conclusion of which a judgment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Romans v. State of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  2. Ludwinska v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. MerolevitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Dennis v. BerensNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Mississippi State Board of Dental Examinees v. MandellMississippi Supreme Court · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Finn v. WhittenNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Cover v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API