Chicago Great Western Railroad v. Schendel
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
delivered the opinion of the Court.-
The Supreme Court of Minnesota affirmed a judgment in favor of respondent for damages resulting from the death of his intestate, Ring, fatally injured while in petitioner’s service and while both were engaging in interstate commerce. The original action was based upon the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, c. 149, 35 Stat. 65, 66, and the Safety Appliance Ajct of 1893, c. 196, 27 Stat. 531, as amended in 19.10, c. 16Q, 36 Stat. 298, 299.
While the freight train upon which Ring served as brakeman was upon the main line at Budd, Iowa, a draw-bar pulled out of a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. GotschallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. LaytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Brady v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. AnayaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1980
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. GoneauSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Raudenbush v. Baltimore & OR Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.