Legal Opinion
United States v. Larry Wayne Lafleur, United States of America v. Nick Michael Holm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 4, 1992No. 89-50599, 89-50644PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on December 16, 1991, (952 F.2d 1537 (9th Cir.1991)), is hereby amended. The last sentence of the first paragraph at 1547 is deleted and the following language substituted.
With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Alarcon and Wiggins have voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Judge Norris has voted to accept the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the amendment to the opinion and the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Samuel Manarite and Jeanne ManariteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- People v. LandryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- United States v. Jorge Andres VerduzcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.