Legal Opinion
Faber v. Queen City Terminals, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 1994No. Nos. C-920760, C-920777PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hildebrandt, Judge.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Frances B. Faber, plaintiff-appellant/cross-appellee, is the lessor of a 6.52-acre parcel of land on the shore of the Ohio River near Cincinnati, Ohio. In 1978, Faber acquired the deed to that land, which, since 1907, had been subject to a ninety-nine-year lease. The terms of that lease give the lessee the right to renew in perpetuity. The current lessee is Queen City Terminals, Inc., defendant-appellee/cross-appellant. Queen City uses the land as a river, rail, and highway distribution facility for chemical and petroleum products.
The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Garono v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Lester v. LeuckOhio Supreme Court · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alpha Benefits Agency, Inc. v. King Insurance Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Banker's Choice, L.L.C. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals & CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Hunsche v. City of LovelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Banker's Choice, L.L.C. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals & CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Holloway v. Administrator of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.