City of Houston v. McCarthy
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Motions for Rehearing
All parties have filed motions for rehearing.
Appellant contends that this Court erred in holding that appellees are entitled to compensation for the damage, if any, sustained by them by reason of the construction of a bridge over property previously conveyed by appellees, in which convey-*387anee there was a covenant prohibiting the erection of above-ground structures. Appellant contends that such damage cannot be recovered in a condemnation proceeding, but can be recovered, if at all, only in a suit for damages. They call attention to City of Houston v. Wynne, 279 S.W.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fort Worth Improvement District No. 1 v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1913
- McCammon & Lang Lumber Co. v. Trinity & Brazos Valley Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1911
- City of Houston v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Duvall v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Wynne v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.