Legal Opinion

Wynne v. City of Houston

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1926No. Application No. 14458PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

In our opinion the covenants in the dedication and in the deeds cannot be construed as intended to in any wise limit or affect the police power of the State acting through the city. For that reason the purchasers of lots acquired no interest not subordinate to the right of condemnation exercised in this ease for the protection of the persons and properties of the inhabitants of the City against fire.

The property embraced in the Eastwood Addition is necessarily in the City of Houston and subject to the lawful exercise of all governmental power and no valid contract could be made…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Harris County Flood Control District v. Glenbrook Patiohome Owners Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  3. Smith v. Clifton Sanitation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  4. State Ex Rel. Wells v. City of DunbarWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. City of Heath v. Duncan, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API