Legal Opinion · Dissent

Omne Financial, Inc v. Shacks, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1998No. Docket 190550Published

1DissentTaylor, J.

I respectfully dissent. The trial court’s order denying defendants’ motion to change venue from Oakland County to Saginaw County on the basis of the parties’ agreement was proper. Neither the venue statutes nor the court rules prohibit courts from giving effect to the intent of the parties as expressed in the contract with regard to the choice of a particular venue. The preferable approach would be to enforce the forum selection clause in the contract unless a party could show that such enforcement would be unreasonable or that the provision was the product of fraud or overreaching. Such an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. SzukhentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Boyd v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Port Huron Education Ass'n v. Port Huron Area School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API