Legal Opinion
Hampton v. Hanrahan
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 4, 1981No. 70 C 1384, 70 C 2371, 70 C 3026 and 70 C 3029PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRADY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed a motion for leave to amend the complaint and add as defendants the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), the United States, various federal officials or their estates, the City of Chicago, and Cook County. For reasons discussed below, the plaintiffs’ motion is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs are given leave to add all defendants proposed in this amendment except the United States, the FBI and the DOJ.
In addition, we find that the amendment as proposed by plaintiffs…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Steven Hill v. William ShelanderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Lacedra v. Donald W. Wyatt Detention FacilityDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
- Carl Woods v. Indiana University-Purdue University at IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Manuel Soto v. Brooklyn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Hyon Waste Management Services, Inc. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.