Texas Moline Plow Co. v. Niagara Fire Insurance

RAINEY, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by plaintiff in error to recover on an insurance policy issued by defendant in error. Plaintiff in error recovered judgment, but appeals because the recovery is not as large as it believes it is entitled to. This is the only issue over which there is any controversy. The agreement of the parties as to the facts is as follows:

“It was agreed between the parties, plaintiff and defendant, in open court, that plaintiff’s cause of action is uncontroverted, and may be considered proved as to everything except the value of the property destroyed. That…