Ex Parte Mihlfread
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN, Judge.
Relator is charged by complaint in the corporation court of the city of San Angelo with having connected with him in his business of photography a solicitor, it being averred that said employee solicited patronage for relator’s business without relator having first paid the tax assessor of the City of San Angelo the fifty-dollar annual-license fee required by a city ordinance. Upon being taken into custody relator sought his release by way of habeas corpus and was remanded to custody, Hence this appeal.
Relator insists that the ordinance under which the complaint was drawn is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- William Hoefling & Son v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Wright v. MaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Sam's Loan Office, Inc. v. City of BeaumontTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Ex Parte ManorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- United Interchange, Inc. v. SpellacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Pierce v. City of StephenvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Fetter v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Houston Credit Sales Co. v. City of TrinityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938