Legal Opinion

Kendoll v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2015No. S063457PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Petitioner seeks review of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 40 (2016) (IP 40), contending that the caption, the “yes” result statement, and the summary do not comply with requirements set out in ORS 250.035(2). We review the certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with those requirements. See ORS 250.085(5) (setting out that standard). For the reasons explained below, we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification of the caption and the “yes” result statement.

IP 40, attached as an Appendix to this opinion,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Greene v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Rasmussen v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Lavey v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Greenberg v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RobledoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Kendoll v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Parrish v. Ellen RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API