Legal Opinion

Wright v. City of Palmer

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1970No. 1192PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before DIMOND, Acting Chief Justice, and RABINOWITZ, BONEY, and CON-NOR, Justices. CONNOR, Justice.

This case questions the validity of a general obligation bond issue for the purpose of encouraging industrial development within a municipality. This is a declaratory judgment action in which appellant, in his capacity as a resident of and owner of real and personal property in the City of Palmer, seeks to have declared invalid the issuance of bonds by the city. These bonds were authorized at a special election at which the proposition carried by a vote of 248 in the affirmative and 7 in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Roe v. KervickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. State v. Town of North MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  4. State Ex Rel. Beck v. City of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  5. DeArmond v. Alaska State Development CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Libby v. City of DillinghamAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Common Cause v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. Maready v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  4. City of Jamestown v. Leevers Supermarkets, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Village of Chefornak v. Hooper Bay Construction Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API