Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Kidd

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 27, 2007No. 19-40179PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JANICE MILLER KARLIN, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Court must decide whether it can confirm a Chapter 13 plan that expressly allows debtors, without the necessity of later meeting the requirements for modifying a plan under 11 U.S.C. § 1329, 1 to terminate their plan before the expiration of 3 or 5 years (depending on whether the debtor is a below or above-median income debtor). For the reasons stated below, the Court finds such a plan cannot be confirmed.

The Court has jurisdiction to decide these issues pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157(b)(1) and §§ 1334(a) and (b). Confirmation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re KolbUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
  2. In Re FugerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2006
  3. In Re HorwitzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1994
  4. In Re EwersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2007
  5. In Re PuetzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Baud v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  2. In Re GrutschUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2011
  3. In Re DavisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  4. In Re HeidekerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
  5. In Re RushUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API