Legal Opinion
In Re Heideker
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided June 2, 2011No. 9:08-bk-11910-FTM, 9:08-bk-18006-FTM, 9:09-bk-24380-FTM, 9:10-bk-01337-FTMPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONSOLIDATED MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DEBTORS’ MOTIONS TO MODIFY CONFIRMED CHAPTER 13 PLANS
DAVID H. ADAMS, Bankruptcy Judge.
Under the Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision in In re Tennyson, 1 a debtor cannot confirm a Chapter 13 plan for less than the full duration of Bankruptcy Code Section 1325(b)’s applicable commitment period unless the debtor pays all unsecured claims in full. Each of the Debtors’ Chapter 13 plans in these cases were confirmed for the full duration of the applicable commitment period. But the Debtors now seek to modify their confirmed plans under Section 1329 of the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- In Re SlusherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2007
- Coop v. Frederickson (In Re Frederickson)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Whaley v. Tennyson (In Re Tennyson)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- In Re McGillisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007
- In Re NanceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re GrutschUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2011
- In re McAllisterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
- In Re MattsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
- In re SwainUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- In re CormierUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.