Legal Opinion

Bicchetti v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 25, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

An employee of the defendant County of Nassau was operating a vehicle engaged in snow removal operations on a highway. Therefore, his performance of that activity is subject to the standard of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1103 (b), which requires due regard for the safety of others and sets a recklessness standard in determining the liability to others arising from the performance of the work. In order for the plaintiff to recover damages for injuries caused by the operation of a vehicle subject to the provisions of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1103 (b), the plaintiff “must show that the actor has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Riley v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Farese v. Town of CarmelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. O'Keeffe v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Levine v. GBE Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Faria v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Haust v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
  3. Small v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API