Legal Opinion

Favero v. Wynacht

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1962No. 10236PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Harrison

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered in the District Court of Yellowstone County, Montana, in an action to reform and enforce a contract of sale on the ground of mutual mistake.

The plaintiffs, Adolph and Hazel Favero, husband and wife, as the first parties, and the defendant, Gayle Wynacht, and one Neil E. Anderson, as the second parties, on July 21, 1947, entered into a contract of sale whereby the plaintiffs sold the corporate assets of the Abstract Guaranty Company to the purchasers, being the second parties, for the sum of $58,075.19, reserving a one-third interest…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Somerby v. BuntinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Voyta v. ClontsMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Havre Irrigation Co. v. MajerusMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Bouma v. Bynum Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Wetzstein v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gregory v. City of ForsythMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Kyser v. HiebertMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Gregory v. City of ForsythMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Favero v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API