Legal Opinion

Gregory v. City of Forsyth

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1980No. 14584PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daly

Plaintiffs appeal from a final judgment of the District Court, sitting without a jury, in the Sixteenth Judicial District, in and for the County of Rosebud, in an action for refund of taxes paid under protest to the City of Forsyth. The District Court determined that the statute of limitations, section 93-2607(4), R.C.M. 1947, now section 27-2-203, MCA, barred plaintiff’s claim and that the disputed land was annexed to the City of Forsyth by acquiescence.

Plaintiffs, Arthur and Dorothy Gregory, are the owners of three parcels of real property located in Rosebud County, Montana. The Gregorys…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. La Porto v. Village of PhilmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Kerrigan v. O'MearaMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Falls Sand and Gravel Co. v. Western Concrete, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1967
  4. Lasby v. BurgessMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Opp v. BoggsMontana Supreme Court · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. D'AGOSTINO v. SwansonMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cartwright v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Osterman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Batten v. Watts Cycle and Marine, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Colmore v. Uninsured Employers FunMontana Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API