In Re the Welfare of S.J.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
This is an appeal by S.J.’s father from a judgment which determined that S.J. was a dependent and neglected child and which ordered continued supervised visitation. We affirm.
FACTS
S.J. is a mildly retarded child, afflicted with Down’s syndrome. At the time of the hearing on this matter her chronological age was seven, although her mental age was between three and four. S.J. is the only child of Joan J. and the appellant, Wallace J. In September 1982 the appellant and his wife separated and, when neither parent felt able to properly care for her, S.J. was placed in a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Matter of Welfare of SharpSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Matter of Welfare of C. ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re the Welfare of V.R.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Thurman Ex Rel. Thurman v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Dependency & Neglect of C.L.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- In re the Welfare of A.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Matter of CLSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. L. and J. D. N., Sr., Parents.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015