Legal Opinion

Thurman Ex Rel. Thurman v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 18, 1980No. 49680, 49815PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

In this personal injury action claiming damages from an alleged soda pop bottle explosion, the jury found for the defendants. Plaintiffs appealed from that judgment and also from the trial court’s order denying plaintiffs’ motion for new trial. 1

We reverse and remand for a new trial on the issue of liability alone.

The issues raised on this appeal are:

1. Was the admission of the investigating police officer’s statement that the ambulance attendant told him that Steven Thurman said he fell and dropped the bottle reversible error?

2. Was the exclusion of the ambulance attendant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. United States v. Darrell L. StrandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Bradley v. ShawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Montagne v. StenvoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Danielson v. HanfordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. GN Danavox, Inc. v. Starkey Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. In Re the Welfare of S.J.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API