Moseley v. Ritter

GARDNER, .1.

The bill makes reference to former proceedings in which the mortgagor paid into court the sum claimed by her to be due thereon, a history of which may be found in Greene v. Greene, 220 Ala. 395, 125 So. 640, and need not be reiterated. Suffice it to say the court ruled that the mortgagor had no right to intervene, and her petition to that end was dismissed ; the effect of the ruling being that the court was without jurisdiction in the; premises. While the bill avers that during the- pendency of the suit of complainant Greene against her husband for divorce complainant Moseley paid…