Legal Opinion

Moseley v. Ritter

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 6, 1933No. 6 Div. 255PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

This case has heretofore appeared in this court. Moseley et al. v. Ritter et al., 224 Ala. 58, 139 So. 94.

After the affirmance of this cause on last appeal, the present appellant, as the widow and personal representative of the deceased mortgagor, J. D. Moseley, filed an amended bill of complaint, in and by which Ida Belle Culpepper Green — theretofore appearing as a cocomplainant with the present appellant— and C. D. Ritter, the purchaser at the foreclosure sale, were made the only parties defendant.

While the cause, as now presented, is not one between pledgor and pledgee,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Security Loan Ass'n v. LakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Slaughter v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Alabama Terminal & Inprovement Co. v. Hall & FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Pitts v. PowledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  5. Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dillard v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. First Nat. Bank of Opp v. BolesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. FormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Garrett v. First Nat. Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Crawford v. HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API