Legal Opinion

Lippincott v. Lippincott

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1944No. Appeals, 137 and 140PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

These cross appeals arose out of an attachment execution issued by a divorced wife to recover, out of a life interest of her former husband in a spendthrift trust, alimony due her under a decree of a foreign state.

From the agreed statement of facts filed by counsel under our Eule No. 56, the following facts appear: James Janney Lippincott is the beneficiary of a trust established by his mother by a deed of trust dated April 20, 1927, the spendthrift clause providing that “so far as may be permissible in law” the income and principal of the trust “shall not be in any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moorehead's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Stewart's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Deutsch v. DeutschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Utica Mutual Insurance v. Easton Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BerfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Van Dyke v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  4. Posner v. SheridanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. In Re Trust Created by MoultonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API