Legal Opinion

Shellnut v. Federal Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 21, 1930No. 19963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In view of the express limitation upon the power of the agent who received the application, the company was not bound by the promise of the agent to call for and collect the premiums. This agreement amounted to an attempt to vary the written terms and conditions of the policy, and in the application itself the insured was given notice that representations and statements by such agent would not be binding upon the company unless contained in the application or the policy. “An insurance company may limit the power of its agent; and when notice that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. PattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Reliance Life Insurance v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. Puckett v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Haupt v. Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Ham v. Brown Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Home Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  2. Adams v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Tsalapatas v. Phoenix InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API