Legal Opinion

Haupt v. Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 1, 1900PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Action on insurance policy. Before Judge Norwood. City court of Savannah. July term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

The defendant in error issued to William Lee Ilaupt a policy of life-insurance, dated March 4, 1898, in which Mrs. Mary L. Iianpt was named as the beneficiary. The policy contained the following stipulations: “All premiums are payable at the home office in Hartford, Conn., but will be accepted if paid to an agent in exchange for a receipt signed by the President or Secretary and countersigned by the Agent designated thereon. This policy shall not take effect until the first premium is so paid while the insured is in good health; and if any subsequent premium be not paid when due, this policy…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. GarmanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Cotton States Life Insurance v. LesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  3. Merchants National Bank v. DemereSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  4. Lewis v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  5. Grant v. Alabama Gold Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Maddox v. Life & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Vardeman v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Bank of Commerce v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Robinson v. Home Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  5. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API