Legal Opinion

Manifold Business & Investments, Inc. v. Multnomah County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff property owner appealed to the circuit court from an order of the county commissioners adopting the report of the road viewers and denying plaintiff damages for taking plaintiff’s property for the relocation and widening of a county road. The procedure followed was that provided in ORS 368.475-368.525. On appeal, a jury awarded the plaintiff more compensation than the county allowed. The court awarded plaintiff attorney fees and defendant appeals only from that part of the judgment.

The county contended that the statute did not provide for attorney fees in this procedure;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Hewitt v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of BarattaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. In re the Marriage of TrudelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of TroutCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API