In re the Marriage of Trudel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
ROBERTS, J.
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
In this dissolution-of-marriage case it would serve no useful purpose to set out the facts because we affirm the trial court in all respects except the award of attorney fees to wife. Husband maintains there was no stipulation that the court could set attorney fees and that no evidence was presented on the issue.
The dissolution proceeding was first before the court on February 8, 1979. It was continued to March 29, 1979, at which time the court requested husband to present evidence of certain pension accounts, a credit union account, and to show the disposition of approximately $36,000 from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of FeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Manifold Business & Investments, Inc. v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lystarczyk v. SmitsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- In re the Marriage of BattCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- In re the Marriage of WhitlowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- In re the Marriage of EarwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Lystarczyk v. SmitsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982