In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Baratta
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
This is a suit for dissolution of marriage in which the husband is petitioner, the wife the respondent. Petitioner appeals from the order, assigning as error (1) the awarding of permanent alimony to the wife, (2) the requirement that he maintain his National Service Life Insurance policy with his children as named beneficiaries thereof, and (3) the award of attorney fees to the wife. There is no cross-appeal.
At the time of the decree, petitioner was 42 years old and the wife 41. The three children, all boys, were ages 13, 15 and 18. The marriage had been of 20 years’ duration. Neither party…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wissner v. WissnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of KitsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Claude v. ClaudeOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Ray v. RayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of FeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Herrington v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of DietzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State ex rel. Drake v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Hook v. HookNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.