Legal Opinion

Monroe v. Ridley

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 18, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 87-1717 (RCL)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on plaintiff’s Supplement to his Motion to Compel Discovery and for Sanctions. Based upon the briefs and counsel’s representations at hearings on the motion, this court finds that defendant willfully obstructed the discovery process and so enters a judgment of default against defendant and directs defendant to pay the costs plaintiff incurred in obtaining this order.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, a former employee of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections, commenced this action on June 23, *21987. He sued…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lyell Theatre Corp. v. Loews Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. United States of America for the Use of M-Co Construction, Inc. v. Shipco General, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. William C. Shea v. Donohoe Construction Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  4. In the Matter of the Complaint of the United States of America, as Owner of the United States Naval Ship Pvt. Joseph F. Merrell, for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability v. Sumitomo Marine & Fire Insurance Company, Ltd., Etc., Defendants- in the Matter of the Complaint of the United States of America, as Owner of the United States Naval Ship Pvt. Joseph F. Merrell, for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability, United States of America v. United States Naval Ship Pvt. Joseph F. Merrell and the Vessel "Pearl Venture", United States of America, Counter/claimant-Appellant v. The M/v Pearl Venture, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., in Rem and Pearl Carriers, Inc., Defendants/counterclaim Sumitomo Marine & Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., a Corp., Plaintiffs v. Pearl Carriers, Inc., and the Vessel Pearl Venture, United States of America v. Sumitomo Marine & Fire Insurance Company, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Bristol Petroleum Corporation v. Larry D. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Webb v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
  2. Webb v. Government for District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
  3. General Environmental Science Corp. v. HorsfallDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
  4. Walker v. ReillyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
  5. Ballard v. Tyco Int’l (Ashcroft)District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API