Legal Opinion
Walker v. Reilly
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 7, 1992No. Civ. A. Nos. 91-2851 (CRR), 92-2657 (CRR)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court held a fourth status conference with counsel for the Defendant and the Plaintiff on December 4, 1992. At this time, the Court reminded the Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that the Court had instructed him to retain counsel on several prior occasions. He agreed. The Court further advised the Plaintiff that he could not adequately conduct a suit and claim involving complicated issues of employment discrimination and civil rights law without the assistance of counsel. The Plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- William C. Shea v. Donohoe Construction Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Bristol Petroleum Corporation v. Larry D. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Robert Lepkowski v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Lorenzo Camps v. C & P Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of Antonio Thomas v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021