Legal Opinion · Dissent

D.W. v. R.W.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 10, 2012Published

1Dissent

Judge WEPING

(temporarily assigned), dissenting.

As science advances and family units sunder, courts are thrust into ever more complex areas. This appeal, the product of *261emotions generated by the discovery of hidden infidelity and the upending of a worldview reasonably developed over the course of many years, places this Court into such a vortex. Because I am unable to agree with the resolution to which my colleagues have come in this matter, I must dissent.

For purposes of this dissent, I use the fictional names adopted by my colleagues. Defendant Richard and plaintiff Diane were married for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. R.A.C. v. P.J.S.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. M.F. v. N.H.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  3. Fazilat v. FeldsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. D.O. v. R.B.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. D.O. v. T.B.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API