Legal Opinion

Fazilat v. Feldstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 27, 2004PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Long

On this appeal, we have been asked to determine whether a plaintiff should be permitted to pursue an action for a declaration of paternity and child support against a decedent’s fully distributed estate. Resolution of that issue requires us to analyze the interplay between the New Jersey Parentage Act, N.J.S.A 9:17—38 to -59, and the Administration of Estates of Decedents and Others Act, N.J.S.A 3B:1-1 to 3B:29-1 (Probate Code), in light of the public policy implications undergirding each. We hold that thé paternity action may proceed but that the claim for child support is barred.

I

Because…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Reed v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hall v. LalliArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  4. E. A. Williams, Inc. v. Russo Development Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. Grotsky v. GrotskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. D.W. v. R.W.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. State, Dept. of Treasury v. Qwest Communications International, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  3. DeNike v. CupoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  4. Alexander v. Seton Hall UniversitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  5. R.A.C. v. P.J.S.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API