Legal Opinion

D.O. v. T.B.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 29, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm Judge Conforti’s decision dismissing the complaint for the reasons expressed in his written opinion of November 7, 1997. He soundly exercised his discretion in rejecting plaintiffs claimed right to subject involuntarily his alleged adult offspring to genetic blood testing. See M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 429, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); see also Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110, 124, 109 S.Ct. 2333, 105 L.Ed.2d 91, 106 (1989).

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. M.F. v. N.H.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fazilat v. FeldsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. D.W. v. R.W.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012