Dolomite Products Co. v. Kipers
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Petitioner-respondent corporation was granted a declaration by Special Term that certain lands owned by it had acquired the status of a nonconforming use as respects rock quarrying purposes. Respondent corporation purchased the property during 1925. In these proceedings the land has been referred to as three parcels, designated A, B and C. Parcel A, which is located north of a railroad track which intersects the property, has been operated as a quarry since 1925. Various buildings were constructed and equipment installed and used in connection with the operation of parcel A. The development…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Town of Somers v. CamarcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
3Cited by14 opinions
- Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v. WeiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Fredal v. ForsterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Buffalo Crushed Stone, Inc. v. Town of CheektowagaNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Bainter v. Village of AlgonquinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.