Legal Opinion

Buffalo Crushed Stone, Inc. v. Town of Cheektowaga

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2009PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ciparick, J.

In this zoning case, the issue is whether Buffalo Crushed Stone, Inc. (BCS) established a prior nonconforming use to quarry certain subparcels of its 280-acre property, thereby relieving it from the Town of Cheektowaga’s zoning ordinances. Applying the analysis set forth in Matter of Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v Weise (51 NY2d 278, 284-287 [1980]), we hold that the long and exclusive quarrying operation of BCS and its predecessors and their preparations to use areas left as aggregate mineral reserves—consistent with the nature of quarrying— established a right of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Toys" R" US v. SilvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v. WeiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. MATTER OF HARBISON v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Rudolf Steiner Fellowship Foundation v. De LucciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Glacial Aggregates LLC v. Town of YorkshireNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Jones v. Town of CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Town of North Elba v. GrimditchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Smith County Regional Planning Commission v. Hiwassee Village Mobile Home Park, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Matter of Cobleskill Stone Products, Inc. v. Town of SchoharieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API