Legal Opinion

Hart v. Hunter

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 23, 1950No. 1435PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELLOTT, Chief Judge.

There has been lodged with the clerk of this court a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, together with an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. There have also been transmitted to the clerk of *154this court, in a letter appearing to have been written by the petitioner, three exhibits which petitioner states he wishes be “filed in conjunction with the petition for writ of Habeas Corpus.” The exhibits referred to are: (1) transcript of the proceedings before the sentencing court at the time of sentence; (2) transcript of the proceedings in connection with the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Hunter, Warden. Rutledge v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  2. Pulliam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  3. Cherrie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  4. Kinney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  5. Hart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Helen Reabe Sobosle v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  2. Robinson v. SwopeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API