Legal Opinion
Pulliam v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 22, 1949No. 3964PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § .2255 to vacate a sentence of imprisonment.
Pulliam and another were charged by indictment containing two counts with violations of 12 U.S.C.A. § 588b(a) [now 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113]. Each count alleged that the bank, which was a state bank at the time of the offense, was a member of the Fed-earl Deposit Insurance Corporation under Certificate No. 11526. Neither count directly alleged that the ‘bank was an insured bank as defined in 12 U.S.C.A. § 264(c).
Pulliam appeared in person and with counsel of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Knight v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Hahn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Bayless v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Tilghman v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Wayne S. Marteney v. United States of America, C. M. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Barrett v. Hunter, Warden. Rutledge v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Crow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Barnes v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.