Legal Opinion

Hollinsworth v. Crossett Lumber Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1934No. 4709PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Plaintiff’s suit brought under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (No. 20 of 1914, as amended), individually and for the benefit of her minor children, was dismissed upon an exception of no cause or right of action.

The petition recites that the defendant, Crossett Lumber Company, was, at the time of the injury and death of the husband and father, engaged in the sawmill business, operating a sawmill at Orossett, Ark., and was in conjunction with that business engaged in the logging and timbering business in More-house parish, La., cutting timber and logs, and in conjunction therewith…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pierre v. BarringerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  2. Seabury v. Arkansas Natural Gas CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  3. Helton v. Tall Timber Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  4. Dewey v. Lutcher-Moore Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. Stockstill v. Sears-Roebuck & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fox Park Timber Co. v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Brown v. EdwardsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Hanzy v. LandryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Pearson v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Griffith v. Wyatt Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API